For José Antonio Riesco
policy and conflict are Siamese twins. We, on May 25, 1810, born as emerging nation, amid lawsuits and confrontations, and the United States with a revolution and then spat between Federalists and Republicans .. Since the relevant processes is usually to decide who, how and why someone sent in the group. Is a field where, with or without violence, man is wolf to man (Hobbes), upon arrival, set up procedures for democracy that the conflict is realized by peaceful means, logically and historically, there is evidence that competition is an indicator of the health agency, whether the biological or social. The peace often generate excessive numbness of the collective.
is also tested in a long experience that when a company enters a cycle of crisis and this has a negative sign, there is the undeniable need to entrust the responsibility of command that holds the best conditions, even without requiring celestial qualities. In hard times, France elected Napoleon Gambetta later and later to De Gaulle. It's time for some special heroism and step back from "the other", whether partners or competitors. Required by the fate of the whole country is, the province or municipality, unless they decide for the worst .. There test the moral qualities of leadership and their attitudes to confer priority over personal desires, the legendary "common good." Aristotle already identified that the highest state order and we usually nominate the word "patriotism."
In a country as ours, whose structural decay and can not be covered using figures drawn recklessly INDEC mercilessly that it is comforting to the millions of poor and destitute that form the "reserve army" of the K model, this comes at the expense of what is before us regarding the behavior of politicians. And no excuses or arguments worth of time. It is essentially a conservative leadership, not in the best sense of the term, as is demonstrated every step they made and make the front of the power, and using a supposed ideological differences to mask the committee desires, be they individual or elite driving.
tilinguería such party has been showing in tangible stage of national politics. For the time being in The ruling, which shine the kitchen of an inmate who can no longer hidden, with the Chairperson being the pennant winner supposedly patronage, and the environment become cockpit. Whether or more occur in the opposition, although some leaders announced his retirement from competition "presidential", but without diminishing the chorus of the suitors of not less than six. The scene looks just like a festival opponent of ambitions and personalities, committed to putting the finishing flag national tragedy. No waiver of any exceptions, and no one raises the banner of patriotism.
argue is whimsically indispensable doctrinal positions and traditions. Forgetting that Argentina did not need it is governed by ideology, much less the nostalgia, but the wisdom, ability and effectiveness of statesmen. Let's work fine in full, and a basic legal rigor, which has built up over time, regain the institutions in the private and public order, expel the offenders, we'll get. What is it not to give in for the common good ..? So let the long cycle of national prostration ..? Despite
time - and by that which, according to Machiavelli, men reiterated their modes of action and reaction - I would bring to the present Argentina is an example of patriotic behavior, I refer to Alexander Hamilton, Federalist and rabid political enemy of Thomas Jefferson, the Republican candidate for president of the United States in the winter of 1801. Although a majority favored Jefferson, the real candidate for president in the electoral college was a tie with Aaron Burr, also a Republican, a retired colonel not very Catholic background, according to his word, only aspired to mate. .
The issue has, by law, the House of Representatives and again repeated the first tie vote, a fact exploited by federal guidelines to support Burr, which endangered the position of Jefferson. It happened that, aware, Hamilton called his political friends warning them about the poor prospects for the nation imply the triumph of Burr. Despite its known position on the Republican candidate, rejected pressure from his party, he and his party voted for Jefferson and he was president.
Burr, Hamilton never forgave and did not hide his bitterness. Hamilton Building Speaking personally affected him, challenged him to a duel and killed him on July 11, 1804. Well paid for his gesture of 1801 one of the finest statesmen of this nation. How many Hamilton have among us ..?
0 comments:
Post a Comment